Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L | 36/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 14.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 36/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 36/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1350 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2700 µg/L | 35/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 204.4 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 386 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 3.04 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 25/29 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 990 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | 3.035 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 14/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 2.345 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 12/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0080 mg/L 53% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 4/4 | LCR | 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 10.85 pCi/L 72% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 11 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 58.3 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.5100 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
56 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Spring Park
Is Spring Park tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Spring Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Spring Park's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Fluoride, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Spring Park serve?
Spring Park reports serving 1,743 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Spring Park had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 9 violations on file for Spring Park, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.