Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-01-19 → 2005-11-15 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 630.4 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 703 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 780 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.75 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L | 11/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 16 pCi/L 107% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 19 pCi/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2024 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.2665 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
51 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing
Is Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Bromoform, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing serve?
Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing reports serving 170 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 18 violations on file for Mn Correctional Facility - Red Wing, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.