Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1999-12-01 → 1999-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 1100 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 204.9 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 241 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 5.525 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 18/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 7.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L | 7/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 5/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 39.44 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.8 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Chloroform | 0.1900 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.2000 µg/L | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.57 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 7.41 pCi/L 49% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 7.6 pCi/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0100 mg/L 67% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 1/1 | LCR | 2024 |
42 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rushford
Is Rushford tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Rushford's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rushford's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rushford serve?
Rushford reports serving 1,860 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Rushford had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for Rushford, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.