Tap WaterIndex

← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

West Concord

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 47 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

47
contaminants tested
12
detected
773
people served
0
health-based violations
Minnesota rankingsLead in MinnesotaPFAS in Minnesota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dodge

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-01-01 → 1994-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-01-01 → 1994-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-01-01 → 1994-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1440 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
568.25 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 801 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
6.1 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L
21/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
5.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
35.885 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.9 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2024
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.17 pCi/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.2 pCi/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
90 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2018
35 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
5075272668
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about West Concord

Is West Concord tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in West Concord's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in West Concord's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does West Concord serve?

West Concord reports serving 773 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has West Concord had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for West Concord, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.