Tap WaterIndex

← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Victoria

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 77 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

77
contaminants tested
12
detected
10,546
people served
0
health-based violations
Minnesota rankingsLead in MinnesotaPFAS in Minnesota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Carver

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
10
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1996-05-01 → 1996-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1996-05-01 → 1996-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1996-05-01 → 1996-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
777 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 927 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
1140 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1300 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
620 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
5.565 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
3.73 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
8/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2023
Barium
31.435 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Lithium
9.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/2 UCMR-5 2023
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
9524434216
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Victoria

Is Victoria tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Victoria's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Victoria's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Victoria serve?

Victoria reports serving 10,546 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Victoria had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 10 violations on file for Victoria, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.