Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 343.55 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 653 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 7.675 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 36.1 µg/L | 66/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 25.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 34/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1440 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 15.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 31/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 31/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.51 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 27/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 26/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 26/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 19/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 820 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0060 mg/L 40% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Chromium | 0.2400 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Barium | 144.56 µg/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Lithium | 15.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 1.52 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 6 pCi/L 40% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2017 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Chaska
Is Chaska tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Chaska's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Chaska's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Chloroform, Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Chaska serve?
Chaska reports serving 30,000 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Chaska had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2 violations on file for Chaska, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.