Tap WaterIndex

← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Coon Rapids

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
18
detected
64,000
people served
17
health-based violations
Minnesota rankingsLead in MinnesotaPFAS in Minnesota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Anoka

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

17
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-05 → 2005-04-06

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0428 µg/L 8/18 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
47.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 53 µg/L
93/103 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.69 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
92/103 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
83/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
82/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
81/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1121 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1470 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
3.02 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
45/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
1100 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
18.65 pCi/L 124%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 22 pCi/L
28/54 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
485.5 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L
24/176 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
6.68 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
17/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2023
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
12/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
122.05 µg/L 6.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 127 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
0.3120 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3200 µg/L
5/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
0.5000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/101 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate
45 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 400 µg/L
 1/19 SYR4 2012–2018
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
7637676493
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Coon Rapids

Is Coon Rapids tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Coon Rapids's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Coon Rapids's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Trichloroacetic Acid, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Coon Rapids serve?

Coon Rapids reports serving 64,000 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Coon Rapids had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Coon Rapids, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.