Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

The Pines at Arundel

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
14
detected
105
people served
24
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
York

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

24
health-based violations
280
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
44.365 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Lead
6.475 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L
16/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
73.55 µg/L 736%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
11/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
12.4 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
21.865 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
3.765 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1282.5 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1300 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
34.74 pCi/L 232%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 39.3 pCi/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
500 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 4/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
498.5 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
2.8 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.28 pCi/L 46%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Toluene
2.7 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
REVITSKY, STACIE
Phone
603-736-8252

Frequently asked questions about The Pines at Arundel

Is The Pines at Arundel tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in The Pines at Arundel's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in The Pines at Arundel's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does The Pines at Arundel serve?

The Pines at Arundel reports serving 105 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has The Pines at Arundel had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 280 violations on file for The Pines at Arundel, of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.