Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.345 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 81.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21 µg/L No EPA limit set | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 86.345 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.3 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 55.45 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 33.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 220.65 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 243 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0123 mg/L 82% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate | 150 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 27.05 µg/L 180% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 43.1 µg/L | 11/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 4.125 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 138 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
39 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Livermore Falls Water District
Is Livermore Falls Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Livermore Falls Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Livermore Falls Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Livermore Falls Water District serve?
Livermore Falls Water District reports serving 2,995 people in Maine, per its EPA record.
Has Livermore Falls Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 15 violations on file for Livermore Falls Water District, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.