← Maine

Tap water quality report

Fort Fairfield Utilities District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
19
detected
2,025
people served
34
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Aroostook

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

34
health-based violations
75
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-09-10
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-09-10
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-07-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-07-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1600 µg/L 123%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3900 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1085 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1310 µg/L
104/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.014 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
77/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
71.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 99 µg/L
37/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
36/44 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
86.56 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 103 µg/L
34/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
946 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
32/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
59.5 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
31/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
24.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
35.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71 µg/L
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L
12/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
22 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
974 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
3.07 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
0.6075 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6100 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.1 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
1.1 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
1.3 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2012–2019
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
EDMUNDS, J MICHAEL
Phone
207-472-1391
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fort Fairfield Utilities District

Is Fort Fairfield Utilities District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Fort Fairfield Utilities District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fort Fairfield Utilities District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fort Fairfield Utilities District serve?

Fort Fairfield Utilities District reports serving 2,025 people in Maine, per its EPA record.

Has Fort Fairfield Utilities District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 75 violations on file for Fort Fairfield Utilities District, of which 34 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.