Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-09-10 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-09-10 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-16 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-16 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1600 µg/L 123% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3900 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1085 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1310 µg/L | 104/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 3.014 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L | 77/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 71.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 99 µg/L | 37/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 36/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 86.56 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 103 µg/L | 34/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 946 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L | 32/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 59.5 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L | 31/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 24.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 29/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 35.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71 µg/L | 29/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0018 mg/L 12% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 12/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 22 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 974 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L | 10/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 3.07 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 7/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.6075 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6100 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.1 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 1.1 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.3 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
59 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fort Fairfield Utilities District
Is Fort Fairfield Utilities District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Fort Fairfield Utilities District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fort Fairfield Utilities District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fort Fairfield Utilities District serve?
Fort Fairfield Utilities District reports serving 2,025 people in Maine, per its EPA record.
Has Fort Fairfield Utilities District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 75 violations on file for Fort Fairfield Utilities District, of which 34 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.