← Maine

Tap water quality report

Boothbay Region Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 83 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

83
contaminants tested
17
detected
8,448
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lincoln

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30
TT Health-based Archived 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30
TT Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01 → 1995-12-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2005-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
960 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1340 µg/L
104/104 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
51.18 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 60.2 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
36.4 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
55/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
55/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
42.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
16.93 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.4 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2023
Nitrate
90 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
9/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
7.73 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
86 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
3/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
0.5575 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5600 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.2620 pCi/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/55 SYR4 2012–2019
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaLeadMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ALLEY, WESTON D
Phone
207-380-5700
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Boothbay Region Water District

Is Boothbay Region Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Boothbay Region Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Boothbay Region Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Boothbay Region Water District serve?

Boothbay Region Water District reports serving 8,448 people in Maine, per its EPA record.

Has Boothbay Region Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Boothbay Region Water District, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.