Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 56.545 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.5 µg/L | 130/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.8 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.6 µg/L | 118/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 800 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 840 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 302.2 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2690 µg/L | 30/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 26.05 µg/L 174% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.6 µg/L | 16/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 28.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 9/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 140 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 4.325 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 134 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.5600 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.07 pCi/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/24 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.8700 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div
Is Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Fluoride, Copper, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div serve?
Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div reports serving 42,508 people in Maine, per its EPA record.
Has Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 38 violations on file for Maine Water Company Biddeford Saco Div, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.