← Maine

Tap water quality report

Belfast Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 83 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

83
contaminants tested
20
detected
5,698
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Waldo

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
29
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1999-04-16
TT Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1999-04-16
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1996-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1996-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-12-01 → 1995-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-12-01 → 1995-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-08-01 → 2017-08-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0067 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0107 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0055 µg/L 2/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
810 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 820 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
239.7 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
663.5 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 680 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.28 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.9 µg/L
31/44 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
2.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
5/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
3.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
5/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
5/9 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
8.26 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.3 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
5.74 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
1.285 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
639.5 µg/L 6.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 650 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Uranium
0.8945 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9100 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.195 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Antimony, Total
0.5100 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
0.7300 µg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MORSE, TAMMY
Phone
207-338-1200
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Belfast Water District

Is Belfast Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Belfast Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Belfast Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Belfast Water District serve?

Belfast Water District reports serving 5,698 people in Maine, per its EPA record.

Has Belfast Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 29 violations on file for Belfast Water District, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.