← Maine

Tap water quality report

Bath Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 82 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

82
contaminants tested
13
detected
9,205
people served
26
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Sagadahoc

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

26
health-based violations
28
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
800 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 860 µg/L
106/106 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
36.44 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 43.8 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
37.2 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
115.5 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 207 µg/L
55/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
55/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
53/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0032 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2023
Lead
22.19 µg/L 148%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.6 µg/L
22/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
1.865 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
16.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
4/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.6000 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
69 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BODGE, NATHAN
Phone
207-443-2391
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Bath Water District

Is Bath Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Bath Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Bath Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Bath Water District serve?

Bath Water District reports serving 9,205 people in Maine, per its EPA record.

Has Bath Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 28 violations on file for Bath Water District, of which 26 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.