← Maine

Tap water quality report

Auburn Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
14
detected
17,245
people served
31
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Androscoggin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

31
health-based violations
41
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
191.25 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 322 µg/L
296/296 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
24.66 µg/L 164%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 428 µg/L
207/295 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
56 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.2 µg/L
129/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48.65 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
790 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810 µg/L
105/105 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2012–2014
Chloroform
63 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2012–2014
Dichloroacetic Acid
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2014
Trichloroacetic Acid
28.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2014
Lead
0.0062 mg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
22/22 LCR 2023
Barium
1.41 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
60 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
6/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.6980 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7100 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
59.5 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
94 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BROADBENT, MICHAEL C
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Auburn Water District

Is Auburn Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Auburn Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Auburn Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Auburn Water District serve?

Auburn Water District reports serving 17,245 people in Maine, per its EPA record.

Has Auburn Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 41 violations on file for Auburn Water District, of which 31 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.