Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-01-01 → 1996-02-29 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 50.634 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.3 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 142.55 µg/L 178% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 159.4 µg/L | 39/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 37.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47 µg/L | 27/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 92.363 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 106.1 µg/L | 27/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 23.267 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.6 µg/L | 27/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1447.5 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 29.53 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.8 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 28.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.66 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2023 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Fluoride | 1295 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1770 µg/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 9/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1070 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 5/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | 0.6100 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dalapon | 1.39 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Mercury | 0.5000 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.08 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Town of Sharpsburg
Is Town of Sharpsburg tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Town of Sharpsburg's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Town of Sharpsburg's water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Town of Sharpsburg serve?
Town of Sharpsburg reports serving 1,360 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has Town of Sharpsburg had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 25 violations on file for Town of Sharpsburg, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.