Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-04-12 → 1995-05-12 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-04-12 → 1995-05-12 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-04-12 → 1995-05-12 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.083 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 34.288 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.51 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 850 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 44.5325 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 44.76 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 22.406 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.32 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0085 mg/L 57% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 10.53 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.543 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.44 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 47.395 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.5 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.9990 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.09 µg/L | 8/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 786.5 µg/L 7.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Arsenic | 0.2030 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.05 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Bloomington
Is Bloomington tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Bloomington's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Bloomington's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Nitrate, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Bloomington serve?
Bloomington reports serving 350 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has Bloomington had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for Bloomington, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.