← Maryland

Tap water quality report

Town of Union Bridge

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 72 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

72
contaminants tested
15
detected
997
people served
23
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Carroll

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

23
health-based violations
26
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6436.5 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7320 µg/L
68/68 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
71.0675 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.9 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.5 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10.998 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.45 µg/L
25/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
37.334 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.5 µg/L
24/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L
23/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
4.525 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
20/24 SYR4 2012–2016
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.6715 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.71 µg/L
12/18 SYR4 2012–2015
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.213 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L
10/18 SYR4 2012–2015
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.307 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.31 µg/L
7/18 SYR4 2012–2015
Barium
36.6 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
5.7 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/18 SYR4 2012–2015
Nitrate-Nitrite
6140 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JONES, PERRY
Phone
410-775-2711
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Town of Union Bridge

Is Town of Union Bridge tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Town of Union Bridge's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Town of Union Bridge's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Town of Union Bridge serve?

Town of Union Bridge reports serving 997 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.

Has Town of Union Bridge had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 26 violations on file for Town of Union Bridge, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.