Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-10-01 → 1998-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-10-01 → 1998-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-10-01 → 1998-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-10-01 → 1998-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-07-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-07-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-07-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-07-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 11.28 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 127/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.5 µg/L | 60/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 56/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 3.45 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 56/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 24/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 23/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2019 |
| Fluoride | 1150 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 5/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 3/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 3/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 5.588 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2 pCi/L 40% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.6 pCi/L 17% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fort George G. Meade
Is Fort George G. Meade tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Fort George G. Meade's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fort George G. Meade's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fort George G. Meade serve?
Fort George G. Meade reports serving 62,234 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has Fort George G. Meade had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 62 violations on file for Fort George G. Meade, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.