← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Pleasant Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 61 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

61
contaminants tested
5
detected
200
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Barnstable

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
36
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2022-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2022-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2012-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2012-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2000-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
540 µg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2025
Barium
10.875 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Copper
21.9 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2018–2019
Fluoride
96 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
56 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
THERESA HAMACHER
Phone
5085141182
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pleasant Water

Is Pleasant Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Pleasant Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pleasant Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Copper, Fluoride. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pleasant Water serve?

Pleasant Water reports serving 200 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Pleasant Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 36 violations on file for Pleasant Water, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.