← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Walpole Water Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
24
detected
24,070
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Norfolk

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
56
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-06-24
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-06-01 → 1997-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0160 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhpa 0.0030 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0070 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFOA 0.0040 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFOS 0.0040 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0120 µg/L 2/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
44.625 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 103.8 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 53 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
56.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 92 µg/L
115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
71.13 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112.1 µg/L
115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
114/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L
114/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
23.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
114/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
70/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
949 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 960 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
30/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2024
Simazine
0.1735 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1800 µg/L
14/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
944 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 980 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
13.4 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
7/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
11.75 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
0.9165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9900 µg/L
4/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.8000 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.1500 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
STEPHEN NUNNERY
Phone
5086607308
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Walpole Water Dept

Is Walpole Water Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Walpole Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Walpole Water Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Walpole Water Dept serve?

Walpole Water Dept reports serving 24,070 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Walpole Water Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 56 violations on file for Walpole Water Dept, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.