← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Scituate Water Division

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
25
detected
19,297
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Plymouth

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
67
violations on file
5
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
TT Health-based Archived 2018-09-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2005-10-01 → 2005-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1996-01-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0056 µg/L 3/10 2023
PFOS 0.0057 µg/L 2/10 2023
PFBS 0.0030 µg/L 1/10 2023
Pfhxa 0.0030 µg/L 1/10 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chlorite
487 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L
174/213 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
103.54 µg/L 129%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 151 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35.12 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L
125/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
120/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
25.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38 µg/L
119/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
111/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
69.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
109/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.1 µg/L
93/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.5 µg/L
91/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.255 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
90/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
2498.5 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2570 µg/L
64/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
30/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
90 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
23/43 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Barium
28.5 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
16/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1060 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L
15/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
1.52 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
13/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
9/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Carbofuran
0.9000 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 40 µg/L
1/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate
2.4 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 400 µg/L
1/24 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroethylene
0.5400 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/50 SYR4 2012–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ERIC LANGLAN
Phone
7815458735
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Scituate Water Division

Is Scituate Water Division tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Scituate Water Division's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Scituate Water Division's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Scituate Water Division serve?

Scituate Water Division reports serving 19,297 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Scituate Water Division had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 67 violations on file for Scituate Water Division, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.