← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Norwell Water Department

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
20
detected
11,495
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Plymouth

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
15
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-07-01 → 1995-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30
MR Monitoring Addressed 2024-07-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0099 µg/L 5/6 2024
PFBS 0.0077 µg/L 4/6 2024
PFOS 0.0184 µg/L 4/6 2024
Pfpea 0.0100 µg/L 4/6 2024
Pfhpa 0.0047 µg/L 3/6 2024
Pfhxa 0.0084 µg/L 3/6 2024
Pfba 0.0060 µg/L 1/6 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
82.12 µg/L 103%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L
119/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
41.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 88 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
30.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.9 µg/L
109/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
47.34 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 103 µg/L
109/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24.99 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45.7 µg/L
100/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.1 µg/L
94/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.8 µg/L
83/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
4660 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4730 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
32/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
21/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
19/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/116 SYR4 2012–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JASON FEDERICO
Phone
7816598076
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Norwell Water Department

Is Norwell Water Department tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Norwell Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Norwell Water Department's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Norwell Water Department serve?

Norwell Water Department reports serving 11,495 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Norwell Water Department had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 15 violations on file for Norwell Water Department, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.