Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 2400 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2600 µg/L | 78/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 13.8 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 69/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.505 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.505 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 50/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.15 µg/L 8.6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 47/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 44/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 43/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 33/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 24/24 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 205 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L | 20/31 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 10/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 10/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 14.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 6/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 12.5 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.7100 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.5900 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Chatham Water Department
Is Chatham Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Chatham Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Chatham Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Chatham Water Department serve?
Chatham Water Department reports serving 30,000 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.
Has Chatham Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 77 violations on file for Chatham Water Department, of which 28 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.