Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 104.66 µg/L 131% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 122.9 µg/L | 253/253 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 37.49 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 78 µg/L | 248/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 25.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47 µg/L | 229/229 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42 µg/L | 229/229 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 60.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 95.7 µg/L | 227/229 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 223/224 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 24.605 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50 µg/L | 220/224 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 135/224 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.404 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 120/224 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 36/224 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 410.25 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 540 µg/L | 36/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 40.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75.4 µg/L | 24/229 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 47.6 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0040 mg/L 27% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 6 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dalapon | 1.2 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Thallium, Total | 1 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Brockton Water Department
Is Brockton Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Brockton Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Brockton Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Brockton Water Department serve?
Brockton Water Department reports serving 105,788 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.
Has Brockton Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 68 violations on file for Brockton Water Department, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.