← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Wayland Water Department

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
26
detected
14,096
people served
15
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Middlesex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
87
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-08-01 → 2012-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-08-01 → 2012-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2005-10-01 → 2005-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2001-06-01 → 2001-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0100 µg/L 3/8 2023
Pfhpa 0.0040 µg/L 2/8 2023
Pfhxa 0.0040 µg/L 2/8 2023
PFOA 0.0090 µg/L 2/8 2023
PFOS 0.0040 µg/L 2/8 2023
Pfba 0.0050 µg/L 1/8 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
18.02 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.3 µg/L
128/138 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
45.86 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.2 µg/L
125/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
12.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.7 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
19.125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.9 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
10.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.3 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
4.162 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.76 µg/L
95/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
3700 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3900 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.6295 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.52 µg/L
84/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 66.5 µg/L
62/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.584 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L
43/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.991 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.07 µg/L
28/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0042 mg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
24/24 LCR 2025
Copper
46 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L
21/31 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
34.75 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
902 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 950 µg/L
13/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromate
3.19 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
2/74 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.6165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L
2/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
2 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Mercury
0.2000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Simazine
0.1200 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/30 SYR4 2012–2018
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DON MILLETTE
Phone
5083583699
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Wayland Water Department

Is Wayland Water Department tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Wayland Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wayland Water Department's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wayland Water Department serve?

Wayland Water Department reports serving 14,096 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Wayland Water Department had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 87 violations on file for Wayland Water Department, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.