← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Manchester By the Sea Dpw

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
23
detected
5,201
people served
11
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Essex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

11
health-based violations
78
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-06-01 → 1997-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-01-01
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01 → 1997-05-19

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0120 µg/L 5/5 2025
PFBS 0.0050 µg/L 2/5 2025
Pfhpa 0.0040 µg/L 2/5 2025
Pfhxa 0.0050 µg/L 2/5 2025
Pfpea 0.0043 µg/L 2/5 2025
PFOS 0.0048 µg/L 1/5 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
61.625 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.8 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.44 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
57/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
29/29 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
17.875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
22.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Nitrate
1700 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
19/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
17/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
23.85 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
854 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 890 µg/L
9/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.9800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
9/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Chlorobenzene
1.4 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Pentachlorophenol
0.1000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2013–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CHARLES J DAM
Phone
9785261242
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Manchester By the Sea Dpw

Is Manchester By the Sea Dpw tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Manchester By the Sea Dpw's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Manchester By the Sea Dpw's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Manchester By the Sea Dpw serve?

Manchester By the Sea Dpw reports serving 5,201 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Manchester By the Sea Dpw had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 78 violations on file for Manchester By the Sea Dpw, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.