Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2002-11-01 → 2002-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-06-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-06-01 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS | 0.0052 µg/L | 1/5 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 32.825 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.3 µg/L | 186/186 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.2 µg/L | 184/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 58.485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 69.5 µg/L | 184/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 77.655 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98 µg/L | 184/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L | 183/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.988 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 172/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.6 µg/L | 159/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.74 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.72 µg/L | 126/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2975 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3200 µg/L | 36/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.08 µg/L | 31/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.5785 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.86 µg/L | 24/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 20/184 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0047 mg/L 31% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2023 |
| Barium | 68.4 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromate | 2.2 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 12/65 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 824.5 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 910 µg/L | 10/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.7870 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8200 µg/L | 7/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 3.2 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.9400 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Danvers Water Dept.
Is Danvers Water Dept. tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Danvers Water Dept.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Danvers Water Dept.'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Danvers Water Dept. serve?
Danvers Water Dept. reports serving 28,087 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.
Has Danvers Water Dept. had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 46 violations on file for Danvers Water Dept., of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.