← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Millis Water Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
25
detected
9,055
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Norfolk

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
94
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-02-01 → 1998-02-28
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0091 µg/L 2/8 2024
PFOA 0.0069 µg/L 2/8 2024
PFOS 0.0073 µg/L 2/8 2024
Pfhxa 0.0030 µg/L 1/8 2024
Pfpea 0.0030 µg/L 1/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3218.5 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3760 µg/L
80/80 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
18.95 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.6 µg/L
42/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.5 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
36/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
8.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
34/42 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.75 µg/L
34/42 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.434 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
32/42 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.8075 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
26/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
2.904 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
25/42 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Trichloroethylene
6.8835 µg/L 138%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L
18/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
1.12 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
17/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.348 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.16 µg/L
15/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.731 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.27 µg/L
15/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
41.44 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 42 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1330 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
0.8430 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8500 µg/L
8/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
7/40 SYR4 2013–2019
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7200 µg/L
3/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
100 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.5100 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/40 SYR4 2013–2019
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, TotalLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DAVE RACHMACIEJ
Phone
5083765424
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Millis Water Dept

Is Millis Water Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Millis Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Millis Water Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Millis Water Dept serve?

Millis Water Dept reports serving 9,055 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Millis Water Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 94 violations on file for Millis Water Dept, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.