← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Lunenburg Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
12
detected
7,219
people served
16
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Worcester

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
18
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-06-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-06-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-04-01 → 2000-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-04-01 → 2000-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 1999-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 1999-01-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0051 µg/L 2/4 2023
Pfhxa 0.0041 µg/L 1/4 2023
Pfpea 0.0045 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
800 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0024 mg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2024
Barium
15.25 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
2.8715 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.05 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
5.0855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.18 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.4495 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.53 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
8.704 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
40.75 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2013–2018
Chromium
1.1 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2017
90 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FRAN G MCNAMARA
Phone
9785824532
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lunenburg Water District

Is Lunenburg Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Lunenburg Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lunenburg Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lunenburg Water District serve?

Lunenburg Water District reports serving 7,219 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Lunenburg Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 18 violations on file for Lunenburg Water District, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.