← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Boylston Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 101 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

101
contaminants tested
12
detected
3,343
people served
22
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Worcester

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

22
health-based violations
129
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-06-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-06-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-10-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0036 µg/L 1/3 2025
PFOA 0.0060 µg/L 1/3 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3125 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3200 µg/L
76/80 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0031 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Simazine
0.1265 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1300 µg/L
8/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
9.565 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2014
Bromoform
2.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2018–2019
TTHM
3.91 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2018–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2018–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.19 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2018–2019
Arsenic
4.2 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2014
Dibromochloromethane
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2018–2019
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SCOTT J MCCUBREY
Phone
5088693400
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Boylston Water District

Is Boylston Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Boylston Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Boylston Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Simazine, Barium, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Boylston Water District serve?

Boylston Water District reports serving 3,343 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Boylston Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 129 violations on file for Boylston Water District, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.