← Massachusetts

Tap water quality report

Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
11
detected
55,560
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hampden

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
8
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Addressed 2020-07-10
Other Monitoring Addressed 2020-04-10
Other Monitoring Addressed 2020-01-10
Other Monitoring Addressed 2019-10-10
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2024-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
8.163 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.81 µg/L
244/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
60.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 84.7 µg/L
244/244 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
67.865 µg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.4 µg/L
244/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
56.905 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 109 µg/L
244/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18.79 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.1 µg/L
243/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
42.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 81.2 µg/L
243/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.049 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.34 µg/L
212/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
143.1 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 145 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2018
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.034 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.59 µg/L
9/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.1 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/20 SYR4 2018
33 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
ELIZABETTE F BATISTA
Phone
4135943420
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra)

Is Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra) serve?

Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra) reports serving 55,560 people in Massachusetts, per its EPA record.

Has Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Chicopee Water Dept (Mwra), of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.