Tap WaterIndex

← Louisiana

Tap water quality report

Torbert- Frisco Water Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
18
detected
1,320
people served
13
health-based violations
Louisiana rankingsLead in LouisianaPFAS in Louisiana
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pointe Coupee Parish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
35
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2022-10-22
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2022-10-22
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2022-10-22
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2022-10-22
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2022-10-22
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2022-10-22
MCL Health-based Archived 2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
18.872 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.04 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.5005 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.52 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
7.7455 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.83 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.63 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.72 µg/L
13/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 8/8 LCR 2025
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.672 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.16 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
12.302 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.36 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
0.9425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9600 µg/L
6/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
6/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
400 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 4/32 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
4.427 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.76 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.425 pCi/L 49%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.49 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2017
Dalapon
3.079 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 2/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
37 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
100 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 1/32 SYR4 2013–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GUIDRY, TONILYN
Phone
225-638-5558
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Torbert- Frisco Water Works

Is Torbert- Frisco Water Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Torbert- Frisco Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Torbert- Frisco Water Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Torbert- Frisco Water Works serve?

Torbert- Frisco Water Works reports serving 1,320 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.

Has Torbert- Frisco Water Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Torbert- Frisco Water Works, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.