← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
17
detected
444
people served
599
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Jackson Parish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

599
health-based violations
791
violations on file
23
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
117 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 253 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
138.1 µg/L 173%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 288 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
133.92 µg/L 223%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 293.1 µg/L
47/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
59.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 136 µg/L
46/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
76.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 147 µg/L
45/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
18.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L
44/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.789 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.36 µg/L
39/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.542 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.74 µg/L
19/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L
13/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
18.6 µg/L 124%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
9/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
265 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
8/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0100 mg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2023
Fluoride
1100 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
13.95 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.8590 pCi/L 17%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.5200 µg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.3500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/51 SYR4 2012–2019
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
COX, JOSIAH
Phone
314-736-4672
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision

Is Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision serve?

Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision reports serving 444 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 791 violations on file for Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision, of which 599 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 23 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.