Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 117 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 253 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 138.1 µg/L 173% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 288 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 133.92 µg/L 223% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 293.1 µg/L | 47/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 59.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 136 µg/L | 46/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 76.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 147 µg/L | 45/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L | 44/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.789 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.36 µg/L | 39/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.542 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.74 µg/L | 19/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L | 13/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 18.6 µg/L 124% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 9/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 265 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L | 8/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0100 mg/L 67% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2023 |
| Fluoride | 1100 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 13.95 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8590 pCi/L 17% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.5200 µg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.3500 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision
Is Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision serve?
Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision reports serving 444 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 791 violations on file for Magnolia-Spring Creek Subdivision, of which 599 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 23 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.