Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L | 55/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 66.31 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 72 µg/L | 55/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 81.64 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L | 55/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.074 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.36 µg/L | 49/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 49.12 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.2 µg/L | 37/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 28.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.7 µg/L | 37/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.2 µg/L | 35/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 300 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 29/48 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 2.075 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 18/48 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1035 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.9750 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 11/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.846 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.86 µg/L | 8/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 13.96 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 5/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.19055 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.29 pCi/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 100 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.9240 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9300 µg/L | 3/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.6760 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6800 µg/L | 2/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 18.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.2370 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Feliciana Rural Water
Is East Feliciana Rural Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in East Feliciana Rural Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Feliciana Rural Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Feliciana Rural Water serve?
East Feliciana Rural Water reports serving 14,829 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has East Feliciana Rural Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 68 violations on file for East Feliciana Rural Water, of which 51 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.