Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-20 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-11-12 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-11-12 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.425 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.8 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 18.231 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.88 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.8785 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.83 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 44.465 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.6 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 9.15 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 6.85 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 10/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 9/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.995 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 8/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Copper | 100 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 7/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 500 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 197 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 6 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.5000 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
66 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about J E S T C
Is J E S T C tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in J E S T C's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in J E S T C's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does J E S T C serve?
J E S T C reports serving 300 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has J E S T C had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 154 violations on file for J E S T C, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.