Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 2015 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2100 µg/L | 38/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 221.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 273 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 496.605 µg/L 621% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 523 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 227.105 µg/L 379% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 262.5 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 98.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 117 µg/L | 27/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 182.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 189 µg/L | 25/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 126.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 156 µg/L | 25/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 141 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 27.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.9 µg/L | 20/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 17.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.9 µg/L | 19/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 10.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 19/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 11.2 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 15/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 165 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 8/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 8/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 68 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 24.85 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.8300 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Columbia Water
Is East Columbia Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in East Columbia Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Columbia Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Columbia Water serve?
East Columbia Water reports serving 2,829 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has East Columbia Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 355 violations on file for East Columbia Water, of which 280 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.