Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-09-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-09-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1990 µg/L 153% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3200 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 27.25 µg/L 182% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 62/120 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 26/26 | LCR | 2025 |
| TTHM | 51.75 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 25/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 14/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 12/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 2/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Bonner Springs, City of
Is Bonner Springs, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Bonner Springs, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Bonner Springs, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Bonner Springs, City of serve?
Bonner Springs, City of reports serving 7,805 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Bonner Springs, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 45 violations on file for Bonner Springs, City of, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.