Is Neodesha, City of Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Surface water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Wilson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

151

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2012-03-01 → 2012-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Fluoride	701.5 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 740 µg/L	40/40	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	204.5 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 240 µg/L	38/38	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate	928 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 950 µg/L	32/32	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	23.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 30 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	45 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 82 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	17 µg/L No EPA limit set	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	22.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 55 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	83 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 95 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	48 µg/L 80% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 100 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	18.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 42 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	6.015 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L	28/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	3.58 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L	19/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	3.86 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L	17/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	8.54 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 14 µg/L	15/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	10.425 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 14 µg/L	14/38	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	83.65 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 84 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0034 mg/L 23% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	8/8	LCR	2025
Chromium	2.14 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L	4/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Selenium	2.025 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L	4/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	1.4 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L	2/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Atrazine	0.5900 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L	2/10	SYR4	2012–2019

41 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: JONES, BROGAN
Phone: 620-325-2828
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Neodesha, City of

Is Neodesha, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Neodesha, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Neodesha, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Neodesha, City of serve?

Neodesha, City of reports serving 2,246 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Neodesha, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 151 violations on file for Neodesha, City of, of which 94 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.