Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-16 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-16 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-16 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-16 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-11-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-11-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2020-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3800 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1280 µg/L 98% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0110 mg/L 73% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 11.205 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 24.65 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.94 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.13 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Arsenic | 5.23 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 47.1 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 297.5 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 16.225 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 2/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.9380 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9500 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Selenium | 16.7 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chromium | 4.7 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.2000 pCi/L 4% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mcfarland, City of
Is Mcfarland, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Mcfarland, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mcfarland, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mcfarland, City of serve?
Mcfarland, City of reports serving 281 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Mcfarland, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 29 violations on file for Mcfarland, City of, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.