← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Mcfarland, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
21
detected
281
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Wabaunsee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
29
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-08-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-08-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-08-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-08-16
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-30
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2020-12-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3800 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1280 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0110 mg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
4.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
11.205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
24.65 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.94 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
3.13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
5.23 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
47.1 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
297.5 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
16.225 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
2/13 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.9380 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9500 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Selenium
16.7 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
4.7 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.2000 pCi/L 4%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2015
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2014–2019
29 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SENNE, LARRY
Phone
785-765-2265
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mcfarland, City of

Is Mcfarland, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Mcfarland, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mcfarland, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mcfarland, City of serve?

Mcfarland, City of reports serving 281 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Mcfarland, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 29 violations on file for Mcfarland, City of, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.