Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-11-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-11-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 9200 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11000 µg/L | 244/246 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 390 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L | 84/87 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 9.2 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 29/87 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 4.37 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 137 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 1700 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 7.14 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 6.76 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 25/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 68 µg/L No EPA limit set | 18/18 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2024 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.65 pCi/L 33% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.7 pCi/L | 11/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Atrazine | 4.5 µg/L 150% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 9/72 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 13.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 21.6 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 1.427 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 3/33 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.078 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.5500 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.1 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
59 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Colby, City of
Is Colby, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Colby, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Colby, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Colby, City of serve?
Colby, City of reports serving 5,516 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Colby, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 114 violations on file for Colby, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.