← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Sumner Co Rwd 4

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
1,157
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Sumner

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
76
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
118.75 µg/L 9.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
26/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
19.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
14.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
25.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
73.5 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.525 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
18/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0042 mg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
7/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
3.99 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
3/30 SYR4 2012–2018

Utility contact

Contact
SHOOK, CHRISTIE
Phone
620-442-3331
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Sumner Co Rwd 4

Is Sumner Co Rwd 4 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Sumner Co Rwd 4's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sumner Co Rwd 4's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sumner Co Rwd 4 serve?

Sumner Co Rwd 4 reports serving 1,157 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Sumner Co Rwd 4 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 76 violations on file for Sumner Co Rwd 4, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.