← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Chisholm Creek Utility Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 61 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

61
contaminants tested
18
detected
1
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Sedgwick

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
1590 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1600 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
1.185 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
8.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
1.765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.535 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
5.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
TTHM
18.7 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Arsenic
2.36 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
32.1 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
3.93 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Fluoride
279 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
9.79 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.56 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.5285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5300 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Copper
1 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2017
43 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KIENTZ, ANTHONY
Phone
316-838-4748
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Chisholm Creek Utility Authority

Is Chisholm Creek Utility Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Chisholm Creek Utility Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chisholm Creek Utility Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Atrazine, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chisholm Creek Utility Authority serve?

Chisholm Creek Utility Authority reports serving 1 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Chisholm Creek Utility Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Chisholm Creek Utility Authority.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.