Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2000-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-19 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 680 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 226 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0019 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 4.72 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 8/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.055 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 51.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.635 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 68.4 µg/L 86% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 78 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 11.4 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.593 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.22 pCi/L 64% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 127.65 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 20.95 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Fluoride | 328 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 330 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 7.24 pCi/L 48% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 7.4 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.6855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6900 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 8.95 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Arsenic | 1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chromium | 4.1 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Saline Co Rwd 8
Is Saline Co Rwd 8 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Saline Co Rwd 8's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Saline Co Rwd 8's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Saline Co Rwd 8 serve?
Saline Co Rwd 8 reports serving 298 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Saline Co Rwd 8 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Saline Co Rwd 8, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.