← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Manhattan, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 92 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

92
contaminants tested
24
detected
54,763
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Riley

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
6
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-03-01 → 1994-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-03-01 → 1994-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
34.5 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
18 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
85/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
15.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
85/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
85/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.695 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
82/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
10.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
82/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
82/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
79/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
14 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 84 µg/L
56/62 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
877.5 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
25/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
300 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
9/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.85 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
3/62 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
2.49 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
52.2 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
2.18 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
17.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2025
Atrazine
0.3100 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.8000 pCi/L 16%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Selenium
2 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
P-Dichlorobenzene
1.6 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 75 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2017
68 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DURAR, ABDU
Phone
785-587-4559
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Manhattan, City of

Is Manhattan, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Manhattan, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Manhattan, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Manhattan, City of serve?

Manhattan, City of reports serving 54,763 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Manhattan, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 6 violations on file for Manhattan, City of, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.