← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Reno Co Rwd 101

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
18
detected
200
people served
78
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Reno

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

78
health-based violations
86
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9485 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9800 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
330.5 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
9.205 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
14/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0078 mg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2024
Arsenic
2.59 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
317 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
3.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
3.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Chromium
5.98 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
5.03 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Fluoride
310 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
3.19 µg/L 6.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
13.27 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
1.4555 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5000 pCi/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.4 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
32 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BASYE, DARCY
Phone
620-694-2976
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Reno Co Rwd 101

Is Reno Co Rwd 101 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Reno Co Rwd 101's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Reno Co Rwd 101's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Reno Co Rwd 101 serve?

Reno Co Rwd 101 reports serving 200 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Reno Co Rwd 101 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 86 violations on file for Reno Co Rwd 101, of which 78 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.