Tap WaterIndex

← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Haven, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
21
detected
1,149
people served
4
health-based violations
Kansas rankingsLead in KansasPFAS in Kansas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Reno

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
28
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6600 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7000 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1380 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
6.175 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
24/34 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0042 mg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 8/8 LCR 2024
Dibromochloromethane
3.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
3.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
12.725 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.32 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.485 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
244 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
3.24 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
229 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.6800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
1.1 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.6600 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
2.1 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2018
29 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CARMICHAEL, STEVE
Phone
620-694-0080
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Haven, City of

Is Haven, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Haven, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Haven, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Haven, City of serve?

Haven, City of reports serving 1,149 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Haven, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 28 violations on file for Haven, City of, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.