Tap WaterIndex

← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Pratt, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
26
detected
6,573
people served
23
health-based violations
Kansas rankingsLead in KansasPFAS in Kansas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pratt

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

23
health-based violations
43
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0091 µg/L 2/19 2023
Pfpea 0.0139 µg/L 2/19 2023
Pfba 0.0052 µg/L 1/19 2023
PFBS 0.0044 µg/L 1/19 2023
PFNA 0.0062 µg/L 1/19 2023
PFOS 0.0041 µg/L 1/19 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9200 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9700 µg/L
258/258 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
660 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 890 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
8.135 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
40/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
1.9 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
340.5 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 430 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
2.955 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
260 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 270 µg/L
28/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
20.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 19/19 UCMR-5 2023
Lead
0.0024 mg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2025
Chromium
2.755 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
10/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
4.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
2.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
15.4 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.86 pCi/L 37%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2 pCi/L
5/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
0.7535 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7700 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.06 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2013–2019
54 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GOFF, REGINA
Phone
620-672-5571
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pratt, City of

Is Pratt, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Pratt, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pratt, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pratt, City of serve?

Pratt, City of reports serving 6,573 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Pratt, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 43 violations on file for Pratt, City of, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.