Tap WaterIndex

← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Osborne Co Rwd 1a

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
22
detected
81
people served
82
health-based violations
Kansas rankingsLead in KansasPFAS in Kansas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Osborne

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

82
health-based violations
185
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-23
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-23
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-23
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-23
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6800 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
158 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
60.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
16.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
28.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
85.8 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
22 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 17/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 16/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
15/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
11/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
3.54 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
9/22 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 7/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
4.35 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
57.75 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 58 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
320 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
21.05 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
2.32 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Atrazine
0.1240 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1300 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.69 pCi/L 34%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.7 pCi/L
3/5 SYR4 2013–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.6250 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6300 µg/L
3/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
2/18 SYR4 2013–2019
28 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HILL, TRISH
Phone
785-342-3330
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Osborne Co Rwd 1a

Is Osborne Co Rwd 1a tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Osborne Co Rwd 1a's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Osborne Co Rwd 1a's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Osborne Co Rwd 1a serve?

Osborne Co Rwd 1a reports serving 81 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Osborne Co Rwd 1a had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 185 violations on file for Osborne Co Rwd 1a, of which 82 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.