← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Brownell, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
22
detected
26
people served
21
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ness

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

21
health-based violations
47
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1989-10-01 → 1990-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1989-10-01 → 1990-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1988-10-01 → 1989-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1988-10-01 → 1989-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1988-10-01 → 1989-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1988-01-04 → 1989-01-03

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
8165 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8200 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
475 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 570 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
50 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
17.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
77.8 µg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 91 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
3.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
8/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.31 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
8/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.55 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.99 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0067 mg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2024
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.85 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
70.8 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 71 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
356 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
12.9 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.9940 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
3/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.55 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.615 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.1200 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.3 pCi/L 26%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2015
28 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NUTTLE, TED
Phone
785-798-7356
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Brownell, City of

Is Brownell, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Brownell, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Brownell, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Brownell, City of serve?

Brownell, City of reports serving 26 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Brownell, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 47 violations on file for Brownell, City of, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.